Queen – ‘A Night at the Opera’ A DVD-Audio review by Stuart M. Robinson

February 5, in Titles

Few DVD-Audio releases can boast the level of hype and anticipation of that surrounding Queen’s ‘Night at the Opera’, due for release in April. DTS Entertainment have already delayed the launch numerous times from the original street date of November 20th 2001, putting the blame on various distribution issues, not least of which is the collapse of distributor Valley Entertainment.

At CES 2002 in Las Vegas however, each DTS press kit contained an advance copy of the disc, although it isn’t labelled as such, one of which is the subject of this preliminary review. The sample looks like the real thing; shrink-wrapped, a DTS seal covering the top of the Super Jewel case and both the disc and inlay card printing appears to be of production standards. For those interested, the stamp number on the disc itself is IFPI LL07 B01K2137 DC-1091.

The purpose of this piece is to provide an insight into what might appear on the final release for those who just cannot wait until April, but it’s important to remember that it is not based upon a commercially released sample and the contents could change prior to the official launch date. Whenever that might be.

For example, we know that Brian May, who it is claimed has overseen the DVD-Audio project since its inception, did not complete the six-channel surround mix until January 16th, which means that the 3/2.1 mix upon this disc is not the finished article…

Which is just as well, since it’s decidedly lacking in many regards. The surround mix itself has a dual personality, one moment conservative the next aggressive, switching partway through some songs as instruments move from distinct and at times distracting surround placement to more conventional positions. In fidelity terms, the DVD-Audio MLP track sounds decidedly rough around the edges, percussion is unstable (cymbal crashes have audible artefacts usually associated with lossy encoding) and there is a distinct lack of any meaningful dynamic range.

Just why the red-hot marketing machine of DTS should release such a sub-par effort to members of the press of all people, is anyone’s guess. It is hard to believe that either Brian May or Roy Thomas Baker would approve. Hopefully things will improve considerably when the final release version becomes available, so until that time I’ll reserve further judgement.

The sample disc contains three audio formats. There are two 3/2.1 mixes; one MLP on the DVD-Audio layer and the other DTS 96/24. To retain full DVD-Video compatibility, the disc also contains a two-channel mix presented as 96/24 linear PCM (which will be downsampled to 48kHz by the S/P-DIF output of most DVD-Video players) but does not offer any form of Dolby Digital track.

The inlay card continues DTS’ current theme of DVD-Audio misdirection. It states: “Each DVD-Audio disc from DTS Entertainment includes a DTS master quality multi-channel soundtrack and a standard stereo track for complete compatibility with all DVD-Video players, plus an MLP 5.1 soundtrack for DVD-Audio players.” The perception therefore, is that only the DTS track is ‘master quality’, where in fact only the MLP really is a true representation of the original master tapes.

The DTS track on the disc is the company’s newest extension format, DTS 96/24, a lossy but backward-compatible way of delivering 96kHz sampled data. In reality however, the entire audible portion of the frequency spectrum, 20Hz – 24kHz, is only delivered at 48kHz resolution and, to accommodate the inaudible data above 24kHz, at a bitrate lower than that of standard (full-rate) DTS. Once again, for reasons explained in the following paragraph, we’ll reserve judgement on the merits of DTS 96/24 until a later date.

The reason I wasn’t able to test DTS 96/24 in this preliminary review was that neither it nor the 96/24 PCM track would actually play on the hardware currently to hand. A Meridian 596 DVD-Video machine produced near full-scale digital noise into a Lexicon MC-12 on both tracks and even during the menu sequences, while a Pioneer DV-717 (another machine capable of outputting 96/24 PCM via S/P-DIF) refused to transmit any data whatsoever. Once again I have to question just why DTS would supply such obviously flawed and potentially damaging discs, regardless of their ‘advanced copy’ status.

As for extras, the advanced disc contains a video version of ‘Bohemian Rhapsody’, complete with a DTS 3/2.1 audio track, a set of ten small photographs and complete song lyrics (the frames advancing in synchronisation with the music) along with the story of DTS and appropriate production credits.

Many of the static disc menus appear to be overly compressed and artefacts are clearly visible around text and in areas of saturated red. Hopefully this is another area the will improve before the final release, especially as the artwork is visually attractive.

The basic disc layout and menu screens can be seen by clicking on the ‘Disc Captures’ link on the left of this page.

One last reminder – this is an advance look at a pre-production copy of ‘A Night at the Opera’, the content analysis upon this page reflects this version of the disc. Only when the final release becomes available will a complete review be published.

Queen-a night at the opera

Queen-a night at the opera

, , , , ,

Related Products from Amazon

1 comment

  1. Nick Watson January 11, at 12:17 am

    I just read the review of ‘A Night at the Opera’ with great interest. The review is quite critical of what was apparently an advance promotional copy of the DVD, but I have recently bought the commercial product and am similarly underwhelmed.

    It was to be expected that a surround mix of ‘A Night at the Opera’ would throw up lots of interesting possibilities. The complexity of the arrangements what with the huge number of guitar and vocal overdubs on this recording must have required immense time and attention to detail when the album was originally mixed in 1974. However, I fear that this new mix may not have had as much care lavished upon it as such a classic album deserves.

    I personally don’t have a problem with the 5.1 panning. Positioning of guitars, vocals and other elements such as harp and effects etc. work perfectly well. My problem is with the instrumental balance. There are a great many points during the album where the decorative overdubs overshadow the basic track, such that important rhythm guitar parts get drowned out by the overdubs rather than embellished by them. Not just the rhythm guitar in fact, but the whole rhythm section; as the drums and bass suffer too. There are places where the band should be rocking and it just ain’t happening. Drum overdubs however, are all huge and impressive sounding.

    Vocal sections are in places rather shoddy too, with consecutive entries jumping up and down in level quite distractingly.

    Another major flaw occurs during the ‘Prophets Song’. The well-known vocal section in the middle (the accapella with echoes bit) must have been edited in from a different multi-track master (an unsurprising necessity in 1974!) and the tape here is running at a slightly different speed. This means that Freddie’s entry is jarringly flat, and just when you’ve gotten used to it the mix cuts back to the band again which – relative to Freddie’s vocal – is of course sharp! Wasn’t somebody listening when they put this together?

    Brian May is credited with co-producing the new mix but I find it hard to believe that he participated in any meaningful way as I can’t imagine him letting these problems go.

    The mix also suffers from a slightly stifled sound, lacking in atmosphere, which suggests that the engineers were a tad over-zealous in their attempts to remove tape-hiss. So annoying! Did anyone ever find the hiss on this album distracting? No – and yet these guys seem intent on removing every last trace of it and sucking out the ambience with it.

    Lastly – the EQ leaves a fair bit to be desired. Most of Side 1 sounds disappointingly thin and harsh, particularly the lead vocal and drums. Side 2 however, is somewhat warmer and easier to listen to.

    Don’t get me wrong, this isn’t bad as such, but for such a classic album, and as a flagship product for an important new format, it just could have been so much better.

    Now I’m wondering if the wrong mix wound up getting released? I have other products put together by the same team which sound much better than this.


leave a reply


Copyright © 2000-2018 HighFidelityReview – Hi-Fi systems, DVD-Audio and SACD reviews - HQ Hi-Fi Review Theme by ThemeShift.com